Surveys? I’m more of a qual gal…

Fuel Your Curiosity Newsletters
Written By michele ronsen

As a UX researcher who focuses more on qualitative studies, I love planning a great workshop and conducting a series of in-depth interviews. There are times, though, when a survey — usually thought of as the domain of the quant folks — is the best way to gather the information our stakeholders need. You might choose a survey to …

  • collect leads or contact information for potential customers

  • gauge “experience satisfaction”

  • quickly measure employee or customer engagement

  • identify trends or priorities

  • determine a position for a product in a particular market

  • gather feedback on packaging, design, campaigns or concepts

  • establish performance benchmarks

  • Screen qualitative research participants

Why use a survey.png

That last bullet’s key — screening your participants is a key reason for a qualitative researcher to have a decent survey game, at minimum. If you haven't been screening your participants up until now, you absolutely should. I'm not a big quant person; it's just not what I do. But I absolutely, positively, am super confident and proficient at developing survey screeners. When you have those juicy sessions lined up, whether moderated or unmoderated, a well-designed screener ensures you’ll be gathering the feedback from the right people!

Your survey screeners can do double duty!

My survey screeners (or recruiting screeners) usually serve a second purpose: I also use them as a way to get directional information — perhaps on one hypothesis or the assumptions from my stakeholders, or maybe for something about my segmentation. I use the smoke signals gathered in the surveys to inform what I am going to write in the discussion guide, how I'm going to author the questions, perhaps some activities within there, and maybe how I'm going to segment the different audiences.

While you should always screen your participants, you don’t have to reinvent the wheel for every study. My personal preference is that if I’m running more than three or four studies with the same group of people or on the same product or service or feature within a year, I develop a participant pool screener instead of a screener specific to a study. I keep that screener rolling so I always have quality, and qualified, participants available as I continue to collect smoke signals.

Practice makes perfect.

This week, my Ask Like A Pro All-in students are creating survey screeners for the real-world research projects they’re conducting as part of the workshop series. We’ll identify who to recruit and discuss how to maximize the number of responses, write and distribute their survey screeners, learn when to use different question types, and design question sequences that move from surface data gathering to deeper understanding. We also cover Likert scales (download my favorite Likert tool here), intercept interview/surveys, intercept recruitment, pros and cons of online surveys, and much more.

I always enjoy seeing how the All-in students grow in this area, and, with today’s ever-growing field of survey tools, often we learn from each other!

If you’re focused on qualitative research, be sure to take some time to work on your survey design skills. Maybe you’re more of a “mixed methods” kind of person than you think!

Speak up, get involved, share the love

And that's a wrap!

We try to alternate between a theme and UX/UXR jobs, events, classes, articles, and other happenings every few weeks. Thank you for all of the feedback. Feedback is a gift and we continue to receive very actionable input on how to make Fuel Your Curiosity more meaningful to you.

What do you think? Lmk. We're constantly iterating and would still love to hear your input.

Stay curious,
- Michele and the Curiosity Tank team


michele ronsen
Previous

There’s never only one way to conduct an interview
Next

Do your questions measure up?